It’s been a while, but exams are now over for me (bar the unfortunate
fact that I have to retype my world politics exam because my handwriting is so
terrible), and so regular blog posts will now return. To get back into it, and
kick off the summer, a few comments on President Obama.
Barack Obama remains surprisingly popular among Europeans in
general, particularly young Europeans. At Warwick’s election night event last
year, cheers rang through the building every time Obama won a state, and
choruses of boos were to be heard whenever Mitt Romney’s face appeared on the
big screen. I’ve long found this bizarre- I could perhaps understand why
the casual observer may have once been taken in by the sweeping rhetoric of the
first black President, but it seemed to me that anyone who took even a passing
dispassionate look at policies and practice, rather than just rhetoric, would
see the sharp continuities between the hated Bush administration and the adored
Obama successor.
Reading through a 2010 article by Pakistani-English writer
Tariq Ali, I was struck by the comparison he drew between Obama and Woodrow
Wilson, ‘whose every second word was peace, democracy or self-determination,
while his armies invaded Mexico, occupied Haiti and attacked Russia, and his
treaties handed one colony after another to his partners in war’ (‘President of
Cant’, New Left Review, 2010, 61,
p.116). It seems an apt comparison indeed, since for all the fine words from Obama,
his administration has more or less carried on the major policies of the Bush administration,
and in some instances even upped the intensity.
Drone strikes are an obvious example. Obama has increased
their frequency by
around 6 times that of Bush, including expanding their use in Pakistan,
Somalia, Afghanistan, and Yemen. I won’t deal with this topic here- it will be
saved for a later blog post- but suffice to say this represents a massive
expansion of an unregulated, most probably illegal (Professor David Luban of Georgetown University said in a lecture at
Warwick earlier this year that the memo justifying the strikes was ‘terrible
legal reasoning’), global assassination campaign, waged in any country Obama
and his advisors deem to be housing enemies of the US. The destabilising effects in
Pakistan are well known; those in Yemen less so, revealed most fully by
excellent independent journalist Jeremy Scahill in his new book about US
foreign policy ‘Dirty Wars’. See this short documentary by him
here
for a window into the impact on Yemen.
Connected to this is Obama’s
expansion of the war in Afghanistan. His
‘surge’ in Afghanistan has probably left the US in a worse military shape than
before, with the Afghani troops the US army is training turning their weapons on
their mentors more often than in any other US war in history (so-called green-on-blue
violence). The Afghan population has seemingly turned completely against
the US, Afghanistan is now constantly in the top two worst
places in the world to be a woman (along with the DRC), Afghanistan is the number
one source of refugees in the world (over 2.5 million), unknown 10’s of
1000’s of civilians are dead, the CIA is fuelling corruption by funnelling millions
of dollars of ‘ghost money’ into the Afghani leadership… and so on.
Recently it has been revealed that
the global kidnapping campaign started by the Bush administration (often referred
to as ‘rendition’) has actually carried
on under Obama. So-called ‘black sites’, legal black holes that the CIA set
up after 9/11 to imprison and torture people they didn’t like without any
semblance of due process (given a relatively easy ride in the Hollywood blockbuster
‘Zero Dark Thirty’) have carried on under Obama, at the least in
Somalia. Scahill, the afore-mentioned independent journalist who also
revealed the Somalian black site, has documented the continuation of and
increase in so-called ‘Special Operations’: secret operations carried out all
over the globe with no transparency or legitimacy, little oversight, no public
knowledge, and often murky consequences.
I’ve
written about how the Obama administration has continued the absurd Bush
policies (and policies of more or less every President of the US) towards Iran,
and we can only hope that Obama doesn’t make his Presidency remembered for
starting a disastrous war with Iran before 2016.
That doesn’t even scratch the
surface of foreign policy- domestically, on civil liberties in particular, he
has been no better.
The Bush administration was
notorious for hauling people into off-shore prisons like Guantanamo Bay,
without the possibility of a trial or release. However under Obama, the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012 has actually
made it legal for the government
to detain any US citizen or foreign national indefinitely without charge or trial, if the executive branch deems
them ‘suspected of terrorism’. Signed in to law quietly on New Year’s Day 2012,
it marked the codification of what Bush had always done anyway and damn the law:
the destruction of the right to a fair and speedy trial, habeas corpus. The act is currently
under challenge in court by a group of academics, activists and
journalists- the part of the act relating to indefinite detention was struck
down, but the Obama administration has appealed (the case continues). Most
interestingly, the administration refused in court to promise that the
plaintiffs in the case (such as Chris Hedges and Noam Chomsky) wouldn’t ever
find themselves being held indefinitely under the NDAA for their work.
Another
aspect of Obama’s attack on civil liberties is the ‘War on Whistleblowers’. In
1917 Woodrow Wilson passed the Espionage Act, designed to put foreign spies in
prison (and almost certainly crush dissent domestically) during WW1. Obama has
blown the dust off the act and charged more
people under it than all other post-war Presidents combined. The people
charged include Bradley Manning, who leaked the ‘collateral murder’ video
of a US helicopter opening fire on unarmed civilians, and thousands of
low-level classified diplomatic documents to Wikileaks. He was kept for over
1,000 days without trial in conditions the UN’s special rapporteur on torture described
as amounting to ‘cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment’. NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake was also charged. There is
some
evidence to suggest that a secret indictment has been issued under the
Espionage Act to charge Wikileaks founder and head Julian Assange.
Lastly for this blog is the vast
domestic surveillance that has carried on under Obama. In the last week or so
it has come out that the National Security Agency (NSA) has
been monitoring between 150 - 300 million American's phone calls, and the ‘PRISM’
programme taking mass amounts of data on users from
internet service providers like Google and Facebook. Those who follow these
issues closely would have been more or less aware that this kind of thing was
going on already, and whistleblowers like William Binney had revealed
it long before the latest story. However this time we have documents fully
confirming it, leaked by (now former) NSA official Edward Snowden, who has now fled
to Hong Kong. The Snowden leak has also revealed a glimpse into the Obama administration’s
plans to wage global
offensive cyber war- but that’s for another blog. Glenn Greenwald, one of
the journalists at the Guardian who received the documents from Snowden,
has
hinted that far more devastating revelations will follow in the near-future.
This blog has barely touched on
the ways Obama has not been the ‘change we can believe in’. Tariq Ali pointed
out in the article I quoted earlier that disenchanted former Obama-supporters
tend ‘to blame structural constraints rather than the incumbent himself’,
seemingly unwilling to accept that Obama is little different to George Bush in
the face of his apparently progressive and inspiring speeches. But one’s elocution is no measure of one's moral fibre; we should assess Obama without reference to his speeches, skin colour, looks or
charms. Policies are what matters. It is true that there are deep power
structures in the US which prevent any President from enacting real change, and
the fundamentals of US Empire go far deeper than any one man. But the gusto
with which he has furthered the cause of US hegemony overseas and domestic
state control should give us all strong pause for thought when cheering on the
next tall, handsome, ‘liberal’ Democrat.
UPDATE: A day or two after writing this, Mehdi Hasan at the Huffington Post wrote a good new piece arguing the same thing: worth a read here.
No comments:
Post a Comment